.. censored inputs ...
.. indicate systemic bias ...
.. and may lead to poster radicalisation
-=*=-
[update, 17Jun'11, update, 19Jun'11.]
A funny thing happened after recently submitting what I regard as a *fair* comment and having it censored; my corresponding blog-report here has so far not been indexed; I don't suppose we really have to wonder why?
"This happened once before
when I came to your door
No reply
They said it wasn't you
but I saw you peep through
your window"
- democracy's the loser...
Censored inputs indicate systemic bias and may lead to poster radicalisation.
-=*end*=-
PS It's not all inputs that are censored (just one would be too many), but what is censored indicates the (erring!) ideology of the censors. That AusBC is tax-payer supported and they dare to un- & anti-democratically censor anything is proof of their corruption and treachery both.
-=*=-
Update, 17Jun'11; Progress. From the google cache @ appr 07:30, this post and the preceding 'message' post have now been indexed, but the home-page cache is still old = down-level. If one wonders how they do that, I'd say 'bad fingers.'
It can be proven that I submitted a comment (I keep the receipts), and that indexing was interfered with. The question only becomes: Whose bad fingers?
[«back»]
-=*=-
Update, 19Jun'11; Progress? Not much, if any; still some down-level indexing. This article is deliberately duplicated, partly as a test.
A bit of nontrivia: Consider auto-da-fé[1], then heretic[2], a thesaurus entry for which is listed below[3]. If we dump all the supernatural implications (as totally invalid), the issue then is truth vs. lies. I advocate for truth & justice; in that frame it is the liars (commission/omission) who are the heretics, aka recusants (recalls Marxisant. Haw!) Also not just by-the-way, 'belief' is what people do in the absence of evidence; hence on principle I am *not* a believer.
Interfering with free-speech is a crime against democracy, and invalidates the perpetrator-platform.
-=*=-
Ref(s):
[1] auto-da-fé n. (pl. autos-da-fé) 1 hist. ceremonial judgement of heretics by the Spanish Inquisition. 2 public burning of heretics. [Portuguese, = act of the faith] [POD]
[2] heretic n. 1 person believing in or practising religious heresy. 2 holder of an unorthodox opinion. heretical adj.[ibid.]
[3] ›noun
he was condemned as a heretic and executed at the stake
DISSIDENT, dissenter, nonconformist, unorthodox thinker, heterodox thinker, apostate, freethinker, iconoclast, schismatic, renegade; sceptic, agnostic, atheist, non-believer, unbeliever, idolater, idolatress, pagan, heathen; separatist, sectarian, revisionist; rare tergiversator, recreant, recusant, nullifidian; archaic paynim.
-opposite(s): CONFORMIST; BELIEVER. [New Oxford Thesaurus of English]
[«back»]
2011-06-15
suppressing information
like failing to index a blog
is also un- & anti-democratic
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment