a change to the idiot Abbott
 might mean emboldened censors
  or just the same old bigoted tax thieves

Silly me; tried again, censored again, here my input:

@Tom Switzer: "American credibility and prestige"

I made these notes as I read the article:

Obama sound-snips sounded weak and unconvincing

arab spring fomented ?% by NED, went violent ?% by CIA

no right to call for regime change

no right to call "red line" - sets false-flag bait

no 'smoking gun' on CW attack, *most likely* US-baited false-flag

the offer noCW=noSA (Syria gives up their Chemical Weapons, and US won't bomb them back to the Stone Age) publicised by Kerry's 'blunder'

"Moscow’s interest" vs. Zs' (Golan Heights; m4s++) + US' (WC7in5)


{Kerry: We won't attack ... if you do this impossible thing.

Syria: Oh, We'll do it.

Russia: They'll do it.

UN: They'll do it.

Kerry: S**t!}

"strict self-defence?" No, + UNSC *correctly* stalemated

US' true (criminal) motive = 'help' Zs steal more land; the road to Tehran goes through Damascus.

arms/$s from KSA + Qatar, jihadis from outside, many Libyan Al-Q

*not* US business; MYOB!

The mission?

see Iraq, see Libya, see Stone Age

prolong and exacerbate it?

~21Aug, new arms = 400 tonnes, perhaps 1000+, all to 'rebels'

Obama has been all over the place

"all over the place" = US rhetoric; see 'digestive-tract accident'

Prestige and credibility?

no US-attack (supreme international crime), no risk &/ embarrassment

UK&/US have coveted ME oil continuously since pre-WW1

one of the biggest problems is: "Say one thing, do another."

they try to disguise their true intentions with lofty principles, latest R2P,

.. but secretly pursue resources by force - as if it's not obvious?

secrecy is a mortal enemy of democracy

no more attacks, no more killing (to steal), no more war!

===== definitions added:

m4s++ = mass-murder for spoil, soil, oil

WC7in5 = Wesley Clark leaking Pentagon intentions: 'US to take out 7 countries in 5 years.'

In full:

Wesley Clark: «About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon ... "This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran."»

-=*end of submit*=-

Comments: What I write is a mix of truth = substantiable fact, and valid opinion based on same. If any are offended, it is most likely that such are part of some problem = are somehow negatively involved with some criminality which I happen to be condemning at the time. At any crime-scene, there are one or more perpetrators, possibly accessories, possibly apologists active, and any bystanders who, if they see the crime in progress and do nothing ('duty to assist victims'), are part of the group of more or less guilty participants. The only ones who may claim the moral high-ground are those who actively attempt to stop crime, and/or bring the guilty to justice.

AusBC censors refusing to publish valid commentary make themselves part of the guilty group.

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC.

It is the AusBC's task to fully and fairly inform the electorate; any deviation from that amounts to treachery, not to mention fraud + theft = taking taxpayers' $s under false pretences.

No comments:

Post a Comment